Even though I haven’t posted in awhile, I have been busy challenging the Illinois school mask mandates.
Since Prizker came down hard with tyranny- taking away the school board’s power to make mask-decisions- many parents have felt hopeless in the face of school mask mandates.
If you watch the mainstream media, I get that you may FEAR the virus. But the truth is that if you are healthy, the virus has a very high survival rate.
Especially, for children, the rate of survival from Covid is 99.9%.
As I’ve mentioned in past posts, why mask AND/OR vax children for a virus with a 99.9% survival rate?
Tyranny, that’s why.
Something Illinoisians are accustomed too.
But in order to break free of the tyrannical matrix we need to peacefully stand up to tyranny in its tracks.
At this stage in the game in cook county, it seems like the masses are asleep and happy to go along with whatever mandates come up.
It can seem disparaging; however, it only takes 1 person to set change in motion.
I may be the only parent at school drop off without a mask outside, but I may be the example for another person to stand up and also say no to this maddness, too.
Monkey see, monkey do.
Another way we are saying NO to tyranny is by pulling our neurotypical kids from school.
We actually homeschooled last year with great success, and as we ‘thought’ things were going back to normal, re-enrolled the kids at our parish school.
Little did I know at the time the Archdiocese of Chicago would NOT accept any child without a mask, regardless of medical condition.
It wasn’t even an hour into the first day of school that I got a call from the principal, IN SHOCK and DISGUST that my son was maskless – even with a doctor’s note.
The Archdiocese of Chicago took it into their own hands to act as our medical provider- telling us that our kids’ doctors notes were essentially null and void as they “declined” the mask exemptions provided.
Now, it was one thing for the Archdiocese of Chicago to deny my Autistic son an education; however, to deny kids an education because of an inability to wear a mask proved that the Catholic community was indeed not what I grew up thinking it to be.
As I chatted with the principal picking up my maskless child, she said in such a quizzical way, “The rest of the kids wear masks. Why can’t he just wear a mask like the rest of the kids?”
Sorry, but we don’t teach our kids to do something because everyone else is doing it!
We’re raising lions, not sheep here.
And my kid’s will surely get a better education in an environment that doesn’t promote the sheep mindset.
In case you missed it, Eric Clapton released a song that perfectly explains how many of us feel about the plandemic.
Check it out before you go, and drop me a note to let me know how you are fighting tyranny in Illinois/wherever you are in the world!
One can interpret that to mean many things, but I think it means that we are living in Biblical times, and we need God now more than ever.
Evil is at the root of the censorship of early treatment drugs such as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine for Covid, as well as the supression of the side-effects of the mRNA vaccines.
Pharma’s bottom line clearly lies in the censorship of competitive and inexpensive treatments, as well as any deemed “misinformation.”
After sharing an interview with from the Stew Peters show with Pfizer whistleblower Karen Kingston, where they talked about the contents of the jab, I found myself thrown in Twitter jail.
I was told that I could delete my tweet to gain access to my account or file an appeal.
I’ve filed two appeals, and I am “waiting” for my second appeal’s results.
I appealed on the grounds of my First Amendment rights being violated by censoring my tweet.
In the interview that got me banned, Karen Kingston says graphene oxide is in the jabs as an excipient. Kingston goes on to cite studies in which graphene can be a conductor of electricity.
She cites that graphene oxide is not listed in the patent because it is a “trade secret”.
She then goes on to show evidence that these jabs include graphene oxide, which is a known to be poisonous to humans.
Here is a link to the interview that got me banned. It’s a must watch- check it out on Rumble below:
In my quest for the truth, I did some additional digging on graphene oxide.
If you search for “graphene oxide Covid vaccines” you will be heavily fact-checked during your search:
Even search results on Duck Duck Go cannot evade pharma’s censorship and “fact-checking”:
If graphene oxide is an ingredient in the EUA “vaccines”, the public deserves to know and consent to having that toxin injected.
The only “misinformation” is that which comes from censorship of the TRUTH.
Don’t you want to know what you’re putting into your body?
Dr. Mercola has been a big advocate of the truth of Covid-19 and the dangers of the clot shot, so it comes as no surprise that he was threatened to take down ALL articles on his website.
He and his girlfriend said his decision was not taken lightly but was necessary due to the threats on their life.
In a post titled, “Why I Am Deleting All Content After 48 Hours’, Dr. Mercola outlines his personal situation with censorship:
Today, I have the most important announcement in the quarter of a century history of this newsletter. My goal and passion has always been about supporting you and helping you take control of your health. I am beyond thrilled that there are tens of millions of people who have benefited from what I have shared over the years.
I am filled with joy and gratitude every time I travel and lecture as invariably many people tell me how I’ve changed their lives by providing vital information they couldn’t find anywhere else and even better that was completely free.
These were the times when many of the views I presented were criticized, but that’s to be expected. That was one of the great freedoms we enjoyed. We could have different views and we could speak openly about these views without fear of retribution.
But we are now in a different time. A much darker time. The silence of free speech is now deafening.
Not only is blatant censorship tolerated, it is being encouraged by the very people who were to be entrusted with protecting our freedom of speech.
We are not living from the lessons we’ve learned before. Never in my life, would I believe the sitting President of the United States call out 12 Americans in a McCarthyism like attack in the United States. As you are aware, I was placed at the top of this list.
The last week has brought a tremendous amount of reflections to me, and a lot of unacceptable threats to a company full of amazing people that have helped me support you in this journey.
By now I am sure you know that there was a recent NY Times article attacking me and it was one of the most widely distributed stories in the world. The article was loaded with false statements made about me and my organization.
The report would be laughed at if it were to be submitted for peer review, the groups that created it are funded by dark money and operated by an illegal foreign agent. The press never questioned it, but ran with their orders from above.
I can deal with the CNN crews that chase me by car while I bicycle from my home. I feel sorry for the people in media that have to follow the orders they are given.
It is easy to dismiss the media pawns, but the most powerful individual on the planet has targeted me as his primary obstacle that must be removed. Every three letter agency is at his disposal, and the executive powers have grown beyond what an individual American’s rights can protect against.
A dissenter of medical mandates is now a target and obstacle to be removed. I know – that’s 25 years’ worth of blood, sweat and tears coming down.
I can hardly believe these words are coming out of my mouth. It’s a testament of just how radical things have degenerated in the recent past. However, I will continue to publish new articles, BUT going forward, each article I publish will be available for only 48 hours and will then be removed from the website.
We are at the crossroad where change is unavoidable. We all must make choices that determine our future. To many, this looks like a war … but what we need to find is peace. I am going to find peace through this sacrifice.
Just to be clear, ALL my content will be removed. This includes articles on:
My interviews with experts
These will be removed to appease the individuals in power who have an arsenal of overwhelming tools at their disposal, and are actively engaged in using them. COVID-19 has activated and authorized emergency powers that have weakened our constitutional rights. Sadly, cyberwarfare and authoritarian forces are beyond our abilities to withstand, and this is now our only way forward.
Over 15,000 articles full of vital information that has helped tens of millions across the world take control of their health, will be removed. There was a time when people could debate and respect each other freely. That time is now gone. I believe laws are best applied like medicine – locally and specifically.
Local food, local democracy – our local community strength is the best way to achieve peace moving forward, and to stop authoritarian technocracy. I also believe we are at our strongest when we can care and maintain respect for each other. This is how we can make our most important decisions in life.
Again I will still be writing my daily articles that I started 25 years ago BUT they will only be available for 48 hours before they are removed. In this way I hope to continue my mission to help you take control of your health – but it’s up to you to download, share and repost this content. I will not be enforcing my copyright on this information so that you may freely share it.
Please also encourage others to read “The Truth About COVID-19,” where you will find much of the information from the past two years that people need to read to wake up and open their eyes. I am donating all earnings to the National Vaccine Information Center.
I want to thank all of you that have supported me over the years. I hope you can understand why I have decided to make this dramatic decision and hope the remaining ephemeral articles will be useful for those who wish to read them.
We will continue through these challenging times together, and remember this:
Your body was designed to stay healthy.
You hold in your hands the power to take control of your health.
Never let anyone take your right to health away from you.
At the end of the article, Dr. Mercola famously quotes Albert Einstein’s truth: “Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.”
If the Covid “vaccines” truly follow the science, why can’t we have an open and honest discussion about the hidden ingredients in the vaccines and the short-term and long-term risks for taking them?
In an effort to help end the pandemic, an international coalition of medical experts is holding worldwide events Saturday to raise awareness about the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.
Two nonprofits—Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) group—who have been campaigning for the off-label use of ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19 say the event’s focus is to let more people know that the antiparasitic drug can treat COVID-19, possibly end the pandemic, and help eliminate fear of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.
“We have an incredibly positive and uplifting message to share: ivermectin treats and prevents COVID and it is the key to unlocking the never-ending cycle of pandemic peaks and personal restrictions and will help restart economies,” Dr. Tess Lawrie, cofounder of the BIRD group said in a press release.
Lawrie is also a co-author of a peer-reviewed meta-analysis study published in the American Journal of Therapeutics that found ivermectin to be effective against COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP virus. Lawrie and her team concluded with a moderate level of confidence that ivermectin reduced the risk of death by an average of 62 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.19-0.73, especially when prescribed early.
FLCCC Alliance also conducted their own review of 18 randomized controlled trials on COVID-19 treatment with ivermectin. They found “large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance.” The authors also said that studies on the prevention of COVID-19 reported significantly reduced risks of the disease with regular use of the drug.
Members of the FLCCC Alliance have developed various protocols for the prevention and early treatment of COVID-19, instead of having patients wait until they develop a severe illness to receive treatment at the hospital. These treatment protocols including one for the management of long COVID are being used globally.
The current standard protocol for COVID-19 positive patients is to isolate at home, avoid dehydration, rest, and take over-the-counter medications for fever, headache, cough, and body pain.
According to updated guidance from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and who are at high risk of disease progression, are recommended to take a monoclonal antibody if hospitalization or supplemental oxygen is not required.
Despite evidence showing ivermectin may treat all stages of COVID-19 and reduce death and hospitalization as a result of its anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties, the FDA has not approved its use, saying that the drug isn’t an anti-viral. The federal regulator issued a warning that people should not take ivermectin intended for horses as the larger doses may be harmful to humans.
The NIH has not changed its neutral stance on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19, while the World Health Organization (WHO) does not recommend the use of the drug except in a clinical study. Both organizations cite insufficient data for not making a recommendation.
Online discussions of ivermectin have faced an unprecedented level of suppression with doctors claiming that their videos are being taken down or their LinkedIn accounts closed.
Lawrie said she has experienced censorship with her work on ivermectin, claiming that her videos about the drug have been removed and posts censored on social media.
“I have experienced a lot of censorship ever since I started doing work on ivermectin (never before),” Lawrie told The Epoch Times via email. “I have had my post of my published peer-reviewed scientific manuscript removed from LinkedIn.”
She also said that many people have informed her that their accounts would be restricted or censored “if they post the work my company has produced on ivermectin or interviews that I have done.”
LinkedIn did not reply to a request for comment.
Dr. Mobeen Syed, chief executive officer of Drbeen Corp, an online medical education, said YouTube took down three of his videos on ivermectin within 24 hours.
“[Third] book burnt in 24 hours. @Youtube @TeamYouTube continue to burn books,” Syed said on Twitter on July 11. “This video was important to keep people safe who are using ivermectin regardless of what YouTube thinks.”
YouTube did not reply to The Epoch Times inquiry on clarification of which terms or conditions Syed’s videos had violated.
Ivermectin is not the only topic being suppressed or blocked by Big Tech firms. Social media posts about the lab leak theory that the CCP virus escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, and information that goes against the narrative about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine has also been censored.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki suggested at a White House briefing that people should be banned from all social media platforms if they post misinformation online about COVID-19 vaccines, alleging that this type of information was “leading to people not taking the vaccine.” Psaki’s suggestion has drawn widespread condemnation.
Regardless of the suppression of ivermectin around the world, people have found unique ways to get the information out. Social media posts of lawn signs have appeared in Manitoba, Canada with a simple message that reads, “Ivermectin treats COVID-19” along with the FLCCC website listed.
Members of the FLCCC Alliance said in a reply to an email that they would continue their mission in getting ivermectin approved for COVID-19 despite the censorship.
“Thank you for your email. Abandoning our mission is not [an] option. Yes, it has been hell. But as Winston Churchill once said, ‘If you’re going through hell, keep going.’ So if we need to leave you here, we understand. But we’ll march on. Your life matters that much,” the nonprofit said earlier this month.
Despite the censorship on Ivermectin by Big Pharma and the mainstream media, advocates will not go silently into the night.
You can celebrate World Ivermectin Day by watching a live clip from the website World Ivermectin Day:
With all the new evidence that’s come to light, we can all agree that Covid came from China.
Was it purposely released? More than likely.
Are the Covid mRNA vaccines being rushed into everyone’s arms by the same people who released the Coronavirus?
Only time will tell. But it sure seems like something Big Pharma would do- create a disease they can profit off.
You’ve likely heard that mRNA vaccines may be more dangerous than ones using a live virus, but why exactly?
mRNA vaccines are technically an experimental gene therapy drug.
Besides the fact that they are experimental and not approved by the FDA, the side effects are irreversible.
When you introduce an mRNA “vaccine” in your body, the mRNA is taken up and not disposed of, then the spike proteins continue to reproduce in tissues. This gives way to a late-onset of neurologic symptoms due to mRNA taken up in the brain.
But don’t take my word for it.
Dr. Peter McCullough and other doctors are concerned about the local production of spike protein causing neuro, cardiac, immune, and hematologic syndromes.
Why should you care what Dr. McCullough has to say?
He is pretty esteemed in his field and holds various titles, such as Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, President of the Cardiorenal Society of America, and the Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology (just to name a few).
He has also been outspoken against the mRNA experimental gene therapy drug since its inception.
Dr. McCullough noticed his otherwise health patients developing severe neurological and cardiac syndromes after vaccination.
One of his otherwise healthy patients developed Cerebellar syndrome after the Covid vaccine, her life completely turned upside down from that decision!
Dr. McCullough has explained this neurological damage happens from the Covid mRNA vaccines because the mRNA is taken up into cells, which produces spike proteins that are expressed on the cell surface. This causes the body to attack its own cells.
McCullough is a brave doctor advocating AGAINST the experimental mRNA Covid vaccine.
Dr. Peter McCullough explains that as far as he knows, there’s no way to reverse the damage from the mRNA vaccines.
Typically, all medical treatments and medication come with “Important Safety Information” (ISI).
There is no ISI insert for the Covid vaccine.
Which is something Dr. McCullough has NEVER seen with ANY treatment in medicine.
Why is the ISI blank on the vaccine?
What is Big Pharma trying to hide?
In a recent interview on the Stew Peters show, Dr. McCullough offers tons of great answers to many questions we all have about the safety of the vaccine and the hidden dangers.
When asked if he thinks the mRNA Covid vaccine is poisonous, he says “the mechanism of action is clearly poisonous.”
Is there shedding from the vaccinated?
He says that the virus clearly sheds from the spike protein, and it is likely happening.
The breakthrough shedding evidence was shown in a vaccinated breastfeeding patient who lost her baby.
Her tragic report can be found on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, and her baby died at one year old shortly after she received the vaccine.
You have to check out the full interview with Dr. McCullough on the Stew Peters show below:
If you’ve had the vaccine, there are ways you can detox your body to flush out the toxins. But there doesn’t seem to be a way to flush out the Covid mRNA.
Here is some more information from Dr. Mercola on the mRNA vaccines:
As explained by Malone, many months ago he warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that the spike protein — which the COVID-19 “vaccines” instruct your cells to make — could be dangerous. The FDA dismissed his concerns, saying they did not believe the spike protein was biologically active. Besides, the vaccine makers specifically designed the injections so that the spike protein would stick and not float about freely.
Well, they were wrong on both accounts. It’s since been well-established that, indeed, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein gets free, and that it is biologically active and causes severe problems. It is responsible for the most severe effects seen in COVID-19, such as bleeding disorders, blood clots throughout the body and heart problems.
Using the word vaccine isn’t really appropriate here, and I don’t want to contribute to the misuse of that word. These injections are clearly not vaccines. They don’t work like any previous conventional vaccines. As the actual inventor of the mRNA vaccines clearly says in the interview, they are gene therapy. So, please understand that when I say vaccine or vaccination, I’m really talking about gene therapy.
In a recent interview with Alex Pierson, Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., discussed previously unseen research obtained from the Japanese regulatory agency through a freedom of information act request.
The study was a biodistribution study done by Pfizer, which showed that the mRNA in the vaccine does not stay in and around the vaccination site but is widely distributed in the body, as is the spike protein.
This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding.
Are you going to trust the mainstream media / Big Pharma/ the government, or trust science when it comes to your health?
The science is not behind children and mask wearing.
As more parents speak out, school districts are making mask-wearing optional in Illinois.
Barrington District 220 just made headlines that it will make mask-wearing optional in the fall for kids in grades 6-12.
While this is a HUGE celebration for liberty and freedom, enraged parents took this as an opportunity to protest the freedom.
Even though young kids technically still need to wear masks!
After the news broke that District 220 would make mask-wearing optional, WGN quickly produced a hit piece showing parents protesting the optional masks.
Check it out below:
Florida and many other states have NEVER had mask mandates for their school-aged children.
As a mom with an Autistic son who cannot wear a mask, He also needs to see others faces to learn appropriately.
My son is a prime example of why the mask mandates are ableist against kids with special needs.
Besides being a prime example of ableism, studies show masks are harmful to our children’s health.
However, Illinois could careless about the actual health of children.
Children need fresh air and an immune system, not masks for 8 hours a day!
You won’t find any information on the internet though, as the government has been quick to scrub any information that may run counter to their narrative or that they deem “anti-vaccine.”
Take Dr. Joseph Mercola, for example.
He is on the government’s “Disinformation Dozen,” yet he provides truth no mainstream doctor will.
Here is a recent article from Dr. Mercolaabout how the science shows masks are NOT the answer for our children:
Mandating children to wear facemasks for long periods of time while at school and participating in other activities is an unprecedented move, one that was put into place despite no research showing the practice is safe. It’s not simply a case of “something is better than nothing,” because the act of mask wearing comes with a risk of adverse effects.
Now that the pandemic is more than a year behind us, evidence is starting to accumulate showing that the use of face masks in children may cause more harm than good. One of the latest studies noted that the evidence base for making face masks compulsory in schoolchildren is “weak,” and looked into their effects on carbon dioxide in inhaled air.
Your body produces carbon dioxide (CO2) as a byproduct of cellular function.2 This odorless, colorless gas is then transported via your blood to your lungs, where it is exhaled from your body. Normally, the CO2 then dissipates into the air around you before you take another breath. In the open air, carbon dioxide typically exists at about 400 parts per million (ppm), or 0.04% by volume.
The German Federal Environmental Office set a limit of CO2 for closed rooms of 2,000 ppm, or 0.2% by volume. If you’re wearing a facemask, the CO2 cannot escape as it usually does and instead becomes trapped in the mask. In a study published in JAMA Pediatrics, researchers analyzed the CO2 content of inhaled air among children wearing two types of masks, as well as wearing no mask.
Children in the study ranged in age from 6 to 17 years, with a mean age of 10.7. While no significant difference in CO2 was found between the two types of masks, there was a significant elevation when wearing masks compared to not wearing them.
CO2 in inhaled air under surgical and filtering facepiece masks came in between 13,120 ppm and 13,910 ppm, “which is higher than what is already deemed unacceptable by the German Federal Environmental Office by a factor of 6,” the researchers noted.4 Also important, this level was reached after only three minutes, while children wear masks at school for a mean of 270 minutes at a time.
Even the child who had the lowest measured CO2 level had a measurement threefold greater than the closed room CO2 limit of 0.2%. However, younger children appeared to have the highest CO2 values; a level of 25,000 ppm was measured from a 7-year-old wearing a facemask.
The study attracted criticism and calls for retraction by those questioning mask risks to children, but in a thoughtful synopsis by Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist and associate professor of medicine at the University of California San Francisco, it’s noted that there are both benefits and risks to forcing children to wear masks.
While large, empirical studies could answer the question of whether masks help or harm children, “we did literally zero of them,” Prasad said, and the CO2 study is attempting to add some clarity. He added:
“Here is the real answer to the question of whether it’s worth it to mask kids: No one has any clue. During the last year and half, the scientific community has failed to answer these questions. Failed entirely.
We have no idea if masks work for 2-year-olds and above, 5 and above, 12 and above. No idea if they only work for some period of time. No idea if this is linked to community rates. No idea if the concerns over language loss offset the gains in reduced viral transmission, and if so, for what ages.”
A German study using data from 25,930 children showed that 68% reported adverse effects from wearing facemasks.8 Among them, 29.7% reported feeling short of breath, 26.4% being dizzy and 17.9% were unwilling to move or play.
Hundreds more experienced “accelerated respiration, tightness in chest, weakness and short-term impairment of consciousness.” Additional symptoms were also reported among the children, who wore facemasks for an average of 270 minutes a day.
Signs of mild to moderate hypercapnia, which is a buildup of CO2 in your bloodstream, include shortness of breath, daytime sluggishness, headache, daytime sleepiness and anxiety.
Hypercapnia is often associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which makes it harder for you to breathe, but it can also be caused by activities that limit you from breathing fresh air, such as scuba diving or being on a ventilator.12,13 The researchers of the featured study believe, however, that the use of facemasks could lead to “impairments attributable to hypercapnia,” adding:
“Most of the complaints reported by children can be understood as consequences of elevated carbon dioxide levels in inhaled air. This is because of the dead-space volume of the masks, which collects exhaled carbon dioxide quickly after a short time.
This carbon dioxide mixes with fresh air and elevates the carbon dioxide content of inhaled air under the mask, and this was more pronounced in this study for younger children … We suggest that decision-makers weigh the hard evidence produced by these experimental measurements accordingly, which suggest that children should not be forced to wear face masks.”
Disposable plastic facemasks pose another risk in terms of the pollution they contain. A study by Swansea University researchers noted that 200 million disposable plastic facemasks are produced in China daily, and “improper and unregulated disposals” have led to a significant plastic pollution problem.
The researchers submerged seven disposable facemask brands in water to simulate what happens with littering, when masks end up in waterways. Micro- and nanoscale fibers and particles and heavy metals, including lead, antimony and copper, were detected, raising significant environmental and public health concerns. According to a university news release:
“The findings reveal significant levels of pollutants in all the masks tested — with micro/nano particles and heavy metals released into the water during all tests.
Researchers conclude this will have a substantial environmental impact and, in addition, raise the question of the potential damage to public health — warning that repeated exposure could be hazardous as the substances found have known links to cell death, genotoxicity and cancer formation.”
Not only are masks not being recycled, but their materials make them likely to persist and accumulate in the environment. Most disposable face masks contain three layers — a polyester outer layer, a polypropylene or polystyrene middle layer and an inner layer made of absorbent material such as cotton.
Polypropylene is already one of the most problematic plastics, as it’s widely produced and responsible for large waste accumulation in the environment. Leading researchers from the University of Southern Denmark and Princeton University also warned that masks could quickly become “the next plastic problem.”
A performance study published in the June 2021 issue of Journal of Hazardous Materials18 also highlighted the little talked about fact that wearing masks poses a risk of microplastic inhalation, and reusing masks increases the risk.
A National Institutes of Health study19 published in February 2021 confirmed that when you wear a mask, most of the water vapor you would normally exhale remains in the mask, becomes condensed and is re-inhaled.20 They went so far as to suggest that wearing a moist mask and inhaling the humid air of your own breath was a good thing, because it would hydrate your respiratory tract.
But researchers from New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine revealed that when oral commensals — microbes that live in your mouth — are “enriched” in the lungs, it’s associated with cancer.
Specifically, in a study of 83 adults with lung cancer, those with advanced-stage cancer had more oral commensals in their lungs than those with early-stage cancer. Those with an enrichment of oral commensals in their lungs also had decreased survival and worsened tumor progression.
While the study didn’t look into how mask usage could affect oral commensals in your lungs, they did note, “The lower airway microbiota, whether in health or disease state, are mostly affected by aspiration of oral secretions, and the lower airway microbial products are in constant interaction with the host immune system.”
It seems highly likely that wearing a mask would accelerate the accumulation of oral microbes in your lungs, thereby raising the question of whether mask usage could be linked to advanced stage lung cancer.
Adding further support that masking leads to an accumulation of breath droplets, which you can then re-inhale, engineers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University developed a face mask that tests such droplets for the presence of COVID-19.
The facemasks contain tiny, freeze-dried sensors surrounded by water. When the wearer pushes a button, the water is released, hydrating the sensor, which then begins the test.
Reportedly, the mask can diagnose COVID-19 within 90 minutes and is “as sensitive as the gold standard, highly sensitive PCR tests,”24 which have been fraught with trouble since the beginning of the pandemic.
If children are risking inhalation of excessive levels of CO2 to wear masks at school, what benefit are they receiving in exchange? Very little, if any, according to a CDC study that compared the incidence of COVID-19 in Georgia kindergarten through grade 5 schools that were open for in-person learning in fall 2020 with various recommended prevention strategies, such as mandatory masks and improvements to ventilation.
The study revealed that COVID-19 incidence was 37% lower in schools that required teachers and staff members to use masks and 39% lower in schools that improved ventilation, compared to schools that did not use these strategies.
Because the COVID-19 incidence at the schools was extremely low to begin with, even with a 37% reduction in incidence from staff members wearing masks, that only reduced COVID-19 incidence by about one case in the entire school. When students were masked, it also made virtually no difference. Further, ventilation led to better outcomes, reducing incidence by 39%.
Dilution methods, which work by diluting the number of airborne particles, include opening windows and doors or using fans. This led to a 35% lower incidence of COVID-19, while methods to filter airborne particles, such as using HEPA filtration systems with or without ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, led to a 48% lower incidence.
While the CDC continues to recommend “universal and correct use of masks and physical distancing” in kindergarten through grade 12 schools,27 a number of states, including Texas, Iowa, South Carolina and Arkansas, are defying the CDC’s nonsensical advice and proceeding to ban mask mandates in public schools or at least make mask usage optional.
In addition to the physical risks, experts have warned that masks are likely to be causing psychological harm to children and interfering with their development.29 All of these risks come at little benefit to children, as, one expert report noted, “Figures illustrate that the risk of death from this disease for this age group is negligible … To introduce these [compulsory face covering measures] without detailed, thorough and meticulous risk assessment, is potentially reckless.”
Mass, peaceful protests are often effective at compelling change, so if you’re unhappy with the facemask policies at your child’s school, contact your local district and let them know.
Dr. Mercola is right about a lot of things, but especially about speaking up to our schools about their facemask policies.
Now is the time to contact your districts if you haven’t already!
We have power in our numbers, which is something the government can never take away.
Need some encouragement?
Check out a clip from the District 220 Board meeting where parents spoke up for mask freedom for their children:
Five people were fatally shot in a nine-hour period from late afternoon Sunday into early Monday in Chicago, bringing the weekend toll to 10 dead among at least 61 shot.
Despite the daunting totals, it isn’t the most people shot during a weekend so far this year, or in the past month. Over the long Fourth of July weekend, 108 people were shot, including 17 who were killed. In late June, 77 people were shot in a single non-holiday weekend, seven of them fatally. Seventeen of those were wounded during two mass shootings alone.
Eleven people were shot in a 24-hour period Sunday into Monday, including the five who died.
Chicago police were called to the 1700 block of West 79th Street in Gresham on the South Side about 4:10 p.m. Sunday for a report of a man who had been shot in the abdomen and hand. He was taken to Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn in critical condition, police said, and was pronounced dead at 4:41 p.m., according to the Cook County medical examiner’s office, which had not released his name or age as of Monday.
A little more than three hours later, officers were called to the West Side. At 7:30 p.m., police headed to the 5500 block of West Rice Street in South Austin for a report of a 30-year-old man who was shot after a man approached him with a handgun and opened fire. The man was hit in the shoulder and taken to Stroger Hospital, where he was pronounced dead at 7:58 p.m., according to the medical examiner’s office. It had not released information about his identity Monday.
At 10:11 p.m., a 31-year-old man was standing on the sidewalk in the 900 block of North Lawler Avenue in South Austin when someone walked up to him and began shooting. He suffered multiple gunshot wounds to the head and torso, and was pronounced dead at Stroger Hospital, according to police. He had not been identified Monday.
At 10:24 p.m., police responded to the 7700 block of South Normal Avenue in the Winneconna Parkway neighborhood on the South Side. A 49-year-old man was standing and talking to someone in a parked black sedan when a person in the car began shooting at him. He suffered multiple gunshot wounds and was taken to University of Chicago Medical Center, where he was pronounced dead at 10:32 p.m.
He later was identified as Robert Fartheree, 49, of the same block on which he was killed, according to information from the medical examiner’s office.
A man was killed early Monday in the 100 block of North Morgan Street in the West Town neighborhood on the Near West Side. He was standing on the sidewalk when someone in a passing silver sedan shot him, police said. The man, 38, was taken to Stroger Hospital in critical condition with multiple gunshot wounds. He was pronounced dead at 1:25 a.m., according to the medical examiner’s office, which had not released information about his identity as of Monday.
Six other people were shot and wounded from Sunday morning to Monday, according to information from police and Tribune records. A total of 11 people were shot, five of them fatally.
Between Friday afternoon and Saturday morning, 18 people were shot, three of them fatally.
Police said a 31-year-old man was shot in the head about 1:45 a.m. Saturday in the 2800 block of West Van Buren Street in the East Garfield Park neighborhood. He was taken to Mount Sinai Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
Tajh Moore, 31, was charged with first-degree murder in the man’s death. Moore, who was still on the scene after the man who was shot was taken to a hospital, told officers he shot the man after a physical fight, police Superintendent David Brown said during a news conference Monday.
Detectives got video evidence of the shooting and saw there was no fight between Moore and the victim, Brown said. In the video, Moore is seen walking up behind the victim and shooting him “execution-style,” he said.
Saturday afternoon, an additional eight people were shot, and none of their injuries were fatal.
Saturday night to Sunday morning, 24 people were shot, two of them fatally. That number included six children, including four teens who were injured in a mass shooting in South Austin, the youngest of them 12.
Brown said drive-by shootings, like the mass shooting that happened Saturday night, are becoming more common.
Brendan Deenihan, the Chicago Police Department’s chief of detectives, said the shooting happened at a graduation party. Police have not found the vehicle that was used, and the people gathered should not have been targeted, Deenihan said.
An 8-year-old boy also was shot Sunday, as was a 16-year-old girl, in unrelated attacks.
Where is Lightfoot and why is she not doing more to help curb the violence?
This violence is UNACCEPTABLE and Lightfoot’s silence is damning.
I pray for peace in Chicago’s streets, but with a Mayor like Lightfoot, it’s just more of the same.
Democrat Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs has vehemently spoken out against the Maricopa County audit.
One has to wonder why, unless you have something to hide?
The Arizona Senate hearing this week discussed a plethora of evidence of voter fraud in Maricopa County.
An astonishing number of UNREGISTERED people voted in Maricopa County in the 2020 presidential election.
To be exact, 11,326 people illegally voted, had their votes counted, and added to the CERTIFIED election results in Arizona.
The same number of unregistered people- 11,326- voted in Maricopa County and WERE NOT on any Arizona voter rolls on November 6, 2021.
Yet somehow they magically appear on Arizona voting rolls a month later?
Who was tampering with the voting rolls?
Allegedly, only the Secretary of State has access to the Arizona voting rolls.
Is this why SOS Katie Hobbs PANICS anytime she’s interviewed about the Maricopa County audit?
Here are a few clips of her recent interviews below.
Again, wouldn’t you comply with an audit to PROVE you won if you had nothing to hide?
She’s also a Democratic candidate for Governor!
Katie Hobbs needs to be exposed for the FRAUD that she is, and the Cabal that she works for needs to be revealed.
Did you know Katie Hobbs is Soros funded?
Interesting how this Soros-funded puppet doesn’t want to audit our national election.
Her time of reckoning is on the horizon.
Hobbs has tried to deflect by asking Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to investigate allegations that allies of President Donald Trump pressured election officials to “stop the counting” during the 2020 presidential election.
Attorney General Mark Brnovich shot back with a letter of his own, stating that for the first time in over a decade, Arizona’s Secretary of State has not submitted criminal referrals for double voting in past elections.
The political back-and-forth was reported by The Arizona Republic, as the state Senate held hearings this week on the forensic audit being conducted by an independent firm. Brnovich and Hobbs both have 2022 election campaigns for U.S. Senate and governor, respectively.
Brnovich’s email to Hobbs was sent Wednesday by assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright, who works for Brnovich’s election integrity unit, before Thursday’s Senate hearing on the top-line findings from the forensic audit in Maricopa County.
“The [attorney general] has not received any information from your office regarding potential double voting in the 2018 or 2020 election,” Wright wrote in the email to Hobbs, obtained by the Republic, noting Hobbs withdrew from a program intended to ensure proper voting.
“Notably, this is the first time in over a decade the AGO has received no referrals from the Secretary of State regarding double voting.”
“Additionally, please provide any and all records your office possesses related to potential violations of Arizona’s election laws.”
A Hobbs administration spokesperson told the Republic the delay in the referrals for double voting is delayed as it waits for a report from a national organization that works with other states to help identify potential incidents of double voting.
The Republic reported on claims Rudy Giuliani and Arizona GOP chairwoman Kelli Ward has reached out to Maricopa County officials amid allegations of election fraud, prompting Hobbs’ letter to Brnovich last week.
Brnovich office declined to comment to requests for comment from the Republic, which noted not commenting on investigations is common.”
Will Katie Hobbs be the first card to fall in the Arizona Deep State’s house of cards?
Katie Hobbs has been caught in a deliberate attempt to cover up the illegal votes by altering state records.
Even just the ONE instance of fraud -11,326 illegal votes- would put President Trump as the real winner of the 2020 Presidential election.
And make the 2020 Presidential election illegitimate.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Trump Won!
As a mom to a son with a vaccine injury, I understand the truth and sadness behind every report on VAERS.
I’ve been laughed at for sharing VAERS in years past, but I’m done being silent because the Covid vaccine is killing and maiming so many of our young that have absolutely no risk of dying from the virus.
I’ve been blessed with great natural-minded doctors for my son who have medically healed many ailments, though he still cannot talk yet at the age of 6.
That said, vaccine injury is a real and pervasive epidemic in society.
All you need to do is check the VAERS Covid Vaccine reports.
VAERS is updated every Friday, and I’ve pulled the most recent report for you below:
OVER 10,000 deaths are not being reported by the mainstream media.
Some will argue the vaccines are for the good of public health.
But even if the vaccine kills ONE person, how is it good for public health?
What if that one person is you?
Here’s a chart which shows how many of our young have been killed by the Covid “vaccine”.
57 kids died under the age of 24 from the Covid vaccine.
That number may not seem significant, but what if that was your child?
I know from experience that you can be that one in a million. Then what?
If there were 10,991 overall deaths and 57 were under age 24, it seems much riskier to give our children the vaccine than have them get Covid, doesn’t it?
Remember, here is what they found in the UK: Researchers estimate that 25 deaths in a population of some 12 million children in England.
The vaccine is still in the “Emergency Use” phase, which waives liability from pharmaceutical companies if you or your child take the vaccine and get injured.
The mRNA vaccine specifically is new and scientists are still unsure of the long term side effects.
However, we are all getting a glimpse into the short-term side effects.
Check out a video of what happens to blood cells under a microscope after an mRNA vaccination.
Why push a vaccine with so much uncertainty on our most vulerable population?
Our nation’s future does not need to be experimented on.
It certainly seems too quick to give this experimental vaccine to our youngest population when the long-term effects remain unknown.
A group of doctors, known as America’s Frontline Doctors, spoke out about Hydroxychloroquine at the beginning of the Pandemic and are speaking up again, this time to “protect the children”.
By suing the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the doctors hope to prevent the expansion of the Covid vaccines to children.
Founder Dr. Simone Gold announced the lawsuit in mid-May, as she hopes to keep America’s kids from being used as “guinea pigs.”
Here is more about the Protect the Children lawsuit from Rumble:
Unmask Our Children
Science shows that masks do more harm than good.
A recent interview with Stanford Doctor Jay Bhattacharya on Newsmax discusses the new studies proving the high survival rate.
Dr. Bhattacharya also mentions other studies coming out showing that masking children can cause developmental delays.
You can watch the interview safely on Rumble below:
Below is another study which shows just how damaging facemasks are physiologically, psychologically, and to your health.
“Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological, and health effects are established. It has been hypothesized that facemasks have compromised safety and efficacy profiles and should be avoided from use. The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidence with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper information for public health and decision making.”
If you are from Chicago, you’ve undoubtedly heard the phrase, “vote early, vote often.”
Around these parts of America, it’s common to hear people joke “my uncle never voted Democrat until he died.”
Or that the cemetary is Democrat.
My mother-in-law shares tales of her days campaigning for old mayor Daley.
As a very young girl she would stand outside the polling places with dollar bills, telling people to “Vote for Daley.”
In case you’ve been living off the grid your entire life, Daley was the heart of the Democrat machine in Chicago.
My mother-in-law would also follow voters into their booths, helping the older folks vote MANUALLY.
This was back in the 1950s.
Today, voter fraud isn’t so blatant.
But it is still as pervasive and insidious as ever.
Which is why patriots are so dedicated to eradicating voter fraud forever.
Today, the Arizona Senate held a hearing revealing just the tip of the iceberg of the fraud in Maricopa County.
The website for the audit was either attacked by the deep state or flooded with people, as it started about an hour later than scheduled.
It literally felt like Christmas for patriots- truth bombs just kept coming about the different accounts of voter fraud.
The amount of voter fraud released should disturb all Americans, not just patriots.
This out of just one county. In one state.
Imagine the nation wide fraud!
We should be demanding our local officials stand up to honest and fair elections, and pressure them to audit the 2020 election.
If they have nothing to hide, what is there to be afraid of?
Auditors in Maricopa County found 25,000 duplicate ballots!
Many didn’t even have serial numbers, making it impossible to know just how many fakes exist.
But the proof was there that fraudulent duplicate ballots were discovered.
Voter rolls were reported to be a mess, and not cleaned up in who knows how long.
Which should also disturb everyone.
There is no need to have dead voters on voter rolls, PERIOD.
Countless Cyberattacks were reported.
74,243 mail-in ballots were counted with “no clear record of them being sent.”
And there was evidence that the paper for some of the ballots was not “official” paper.
Becker News has a great summary of all the fraud exposed today:
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann held a public briefing on Thursday with the leaders of the ongoing election audit that she authorized. The auditors’ update was harrowing: 74,000 absentee ballots lacked documentation, thousands of ballots were duplicated without proper documentation, and most shockingly, over 11,000 voters were not on the November election voter rolls, but showed up later on the December voter rolls.
As a reminder, Donald Trump lost Arizona to Joe Biden by 10,457 votes, or merely 0.3 percent of the state’s certified count.
The two-hour Arizona State Senate briefing is provided below.
The testimony of digital forensics expert Ben Cotton discussed the rigorous procedures that were undertaken, including 24/7 surveillance, and processes to ensure that not a ‘single bit’ of the election data could possibly be changed.
Cotton’s testimony rebutted claims that the voting machines were compromised and thus could not be used in future elections.
“I have this question, I don’t understand,” Fann said, “How can the Secretary of State say that she can’t certify the machines weren’t tampered with, when supposedly we have people that… certified people that come in to certify machines aren’t tampered with? It doesn’t make sense. Could you explain that to me please?”
“Madame President, I certainly undertand your confusion, and I share that with you,” Cotton said. “I’d also like to reiterate that as part of our evidence handling procedure, we had cameras watching over our evidence storage facilities and our acquisition and replication procedures 24/7.”
“So, any form of tampering certainly would have been caught,” he added.
Former Arizona Secretary of State and State Senate liaison Ken Bennett discussed the chain-of-custody procedures and the questions involving duplicated ballots.
The ballot boxes for the independent audit were received from Maricopa County and then locked up in cages with 24-hour guarded armed security, both inside and outside the facility, as well as 24-hour livestreamed surveillance video, Bennett said.
He said that there was “continuous and complete” chain-of-custody documentation for all the ballot boxes and voting equipment.
The Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan revealed a number of alarming ballot issues. Many of the ballots had “bleed through” and printer calibration issues. Logan said there were “roughly 160,000” ballots-on-demand in Maricopa County on Election Day. These ballots were unlikely to be ‘Vote Safe’ by using standardized paper for elections.
Arizona Senate President Fann noted that the media had earlier questioned those who had raised such issues, mockingly labeling them as purveyors of ‘Sharpiegate.’
Fann pointed to canvasing as one of the possible solutions to resolving issues of voter intent, while pointing out the hypocrisy of critics, even those in the Biden Department of Justice, who pointed at the practice as one that could potentially lead to ‘voter intimidation.’
“I do know of a case where one house got 25 ballots in the mail and only two people live there,” Fann said. “And so we had talked about how we verify that. And there was a question about canvasing.”
“The Department of Justice sent us a letter about four or six weeks ago,” she continued. “And said, ‘we’re concerned about you actually knocking on doors, that it might be… voter intimidation or civil rights violation or something’.”
“Which I find it interesting, after the White House last week said ‘we’re going to knock on doors to see if you are vaccinated or not’,” she added. “But that’s a side point,” she noted, then said that such a canvasing effort is postponed conditional upon the results of the audit.
“Based on the data we’re seeing, I highly recommend canvasing,” Logan said. “Because it is the one way to know for sure whether some of the data we’re seeing, if it’s real problems or whether it’s clerical errors of some sort.”
“For example, 74,243 mail-in ballots, where there is no clear record of them being sent,” Logan said. “And just to be clear, here in the state of Arizona there is EB32s and EB33s. EB32s is supposed to give a record of when a mail-in ballot is sent. And EB33 is supposed to give a record of when the mail-in ballot is received.”
“So there should be an equal… there should be more EB32s, more sent out then there are received. Specifically, with these we can tie them to a specific individual it was mailed to,” he continued. “And so, we have 74,000 where we have, it came back from individuals where we don’t have a clear indicationthat it was ever sent out to them.”
“But I think when you have 74,000, it merits knocking on a door and validating some of this information,” he added.
Logan then talked about the lowering of signature-matching standards on envelopes to allow more absentee ballots through. He pointed to a legal affidavit.
“When mail-in ballots were received, that so many of them were received, that the standards reduced over time,” he said. “They originally talked about, there was initially 20 points of comparison on the signature, then after some time they were told to go to ten points a signature, ten points of comparison, and then five,” he noted. “And then eventually, they were just told to let every single mail-in ballot through.”
“We think it’s important to get the mail-in ballot images,” he added. “And see how many, if any, blank signatures came through.”
Then Logan revealed one of the most bewildering preliminary findings of the audit: Voter rolls issues.
“We have also seen some interesting things related to the voter rolls,” Logan said. “So, for example, we have 11,326 people that did not show up on a November 7th version of the voter rolls, and after votes were cast, but then appeared on the December 4th voter rolls.”
“Just to be clear, they show as voted this past election,” he added. “But they were not on the November 7th version of the file, but they did show up on the December 4th version.”
The news follows upon massive developments in the Fulton County election audit, which shows thousands of ballots were wrongfully counted for Biden in the ballot tallies. Tucker Carlson revealed the evidence in a bombshell segment on Wednesday night.
We also have a clip, courtesy of Becker News, so you can watch the entire Arizona audit hearing for yourself.
Arizona Senate hearings on the Maricopa County Election Audit is devastating news to the Radical Left Democrats and the Biden Administration. While this, according to the Senate, is preliminary, with results being announced at a later date, it seems that 74,243 Mail-In Ballots were counted with “no clear record of them being sent.” There were 18,000 voters who were scrubbed from the voter rolls AFTER the election. They also revealed that the voting system was breached or hacked (by who?). Very big printer and ballot problems with different paper used, etc., and MUCH MORE.
The irregularities revealed at the hearing today amount to hundreds of thousands of votes or, many times what is necessary for us to have won. Despite these massive numbers, this is the State that Fox News called early for a Biden victory. There was no victory here, or in any other of the Swing States either.
Maricopa County refuses to work together with the Senate and others who are merely looking for honesty, integrity, and transparency. Why do the Commissioners not want to look into this corrupted election? What are they trying to hide? The highly respected State Senator Wendy Rogers said in a tweet the hearing today means we must decertify the election. In any event, the Senate patriots are moving forward with final results to be announced in the not-too-distant future, but based on today’s hearing, why even wait?”
He only lost Arizona by less than 11,000 votes.
Hold the line, patriots, this part of the movie is getting good.
As General Flynn said tonight, “Nothing can destroy a man with a heart of a lion. Behind him is the army of patriots who know what is the right choice for a better tomorrow. Patriots stay united, the STORM is coming!